Race to the Top: District Competition (RttT-D)

 
  • Grants Office Grantwriting service fee starts at $7900
    Get more information on grantwriting

    CFDA#

    84.395
     

    Funder Type

    Federal Government

    IT Classification

    A - Primarily intended to fund technology

    Authority

    U.S. Department of Education

    Summary

    The Race to the Top State competitions provided incentives to States to adopt bold and comprehensive reforms in elementary and secondary education and laid the foundation for unprecedented innovation. A total of 46 States and the District of Columbia put together plans to  implement college- and career-ready standards, use data systems to guide learning and teaching, evaluate  and support teachers and school leaders, and turn around their lowest-performing schools. The purpose of the Race to the Top – District competition is to build on the momentum of other Race to the Top competitions by encouraging bold, innovative reform at the local level.

    The Race to the Top – District competition invites applicants to demonstrate how they can personalize education for all students in their schools. The Race to the Top – District competition is aimed squarely at classrooms and the all-important relationship between educators and students. An LEA or consortium of LEAs receiving an award under this competition will build on the experience of States and districts in implementing reforms in the four core educational assurance areas through Race to the Top and other key programs. A successful applicant will provide teachers the information, tools, and supports that will enable them to meet the needs of each student and substantially accelerate and deepen each student’s learning. These LEAs will have the policies, systems, infrastructure, capacity, and culture to enable teachers, teacher teams, and school leaders to continuously focus on improving individual student achievement and closing achievement gaps. These LEAs will also make equity and access a priority and aim to prepare each student to master the content and skills required for college- and career-readiness, provide each student the opportunity to pursue a rigorous course of study, and accelerate and deepen students’ learning through attention to their individual needs. As important, they will create opportunities for students to identify and pursue areas of personal academic interest – all while ensuring that each student masters critical areas identified in college- and career-ready standards or college- and career-ready high school graduation requirements.

    In 2013, the district competition will have five absolute priorities.

    • Personalized Learning Environments: To meet this priority, an applicant must coherently and comprehensively address how it will build on the core educational assurance areas to create learning environments that are designed to significantly improve learning and teaching through the personalization of strategies, tools, and supports for students and educators that are aligned with college- and career-ready standards or college- and career-ready graduation requirements; accelerate student achievement and deepen student learning by meeting the academic needs of each student; increase the effectiveness of educators; expand student access to the most effective educators; decrease achievement gaps across student groups; and increase the rates at which students graduate from high school prepared for college and careers.
    • Non-Rural LEAs in Race to the Top States: To meet this priority, an applicant must be an LEA or a consortium of LEAs in which more than 50 percent of participating students are in non-rural LEAs in States that received awards under the Race to the Top Phase 1, Phase 2, or Phase 3 competition.
    • Rural LEAs in Race to the Top States: To meet this priority, an applicant must be an LEA or a consortium of LEAs in which more than 50 percent of participating students are in rural LEAs in States that received awards under the Race to the Top Phase 1, Phase 2, or Phase 3 competition.
    • Non-Rural LEAs in non-Race to the Top States: To meet this priority, an applicant must be an LEA or a consortium of LEAs in which more than 50 percent of participating students  are in non-rural LEAs in States that did not receive awards under the Race to the Top Phase 1, Phase 2, or Phase 3 competition.
    • Rural LEAs in non-Race to the Top States: To meet this priority, an applicant must be an LEA or a consortium of LEAs in which more than 50 percent of participating students are in rural LEAs in States that did not receive awards under the Race to the Top Phase 1, Phase 2, or Phase 3 competition.

    The 2013 competitive preference priority is for:

    • Results, Resource Alignment, and Integrated Services: The Department will give priority to an applicant based on the extent to which the applicant proposes to integrate public or private resources in a partnership designed to augment the schools’ resources by providing additional student and family supports to schools that address the social, emotional, or behavioral needs of the participating students, giving highest priority to students in participating schools with high-need students. To meet this priority, an applicant’s proposal does not need to be comprehensive and may provide student and family supports that focus on a subset of these needs.
     

    History of Funding

    In the FY 2012 competition, the Department awarded approximately $383 million to 16 Race to the Top – District grantees representing  55 local educational agencies (LEAs), with grants ranging from $10 to $40 million. 

    Previous district awards can be found at; http://www2.ed.gov/programs/racetothetop-district/awards.html

    Additional Information

    In general, FY 2013 Race to the Top – District grant funds must be used to implement the applicant’s approved FY 2013 Race to the Top – District plan,  including the applicant’s approved budget; the budget must be consistent with the Department’s administrative regulations as well as OMB’s cost principle circulars, such as A-87. The ARRA places several restrictions on the use of FY 2013 Race to the Top – District grant funds, as described below. With these exceptions, applicants have considerable flexibility in designing their plans and, therefore, have considerable discretion in determining how grant funds will be used, consistent with their approved plan, if they are awarded a grant. As noted above, the ARRA places several restrictions on uses of Race to the Top grant funds as follows: Section 14003 of the ARRA prohibits Race to the Top funds from being used for:

    • Payment of maintenance costs;
    • Stadiums or other facilities primarily used for athletic contests or exhibitions or other events for which admission is charged to the general public;
    • Purchase or upgrade of vehicles;
    • Improvement of stand-alone facilities whose purpose is not the education of children, including central office administration or operations or logistical  support facilities; or
    • School modernization, renovation, or repair that is inconsistent with State law;
    • Section 14011 of the ARRA prohibits Race to the Top funds from being used to provide  financial assistance to students to attend private elementary or secondary schools, unless  the funds are used to provide special education and related services to children with  disabilities as authorized by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA); and
    • Section 1604 of the ARRA prohibits Race to the Top funds from being used for any casino or other gambling establishment, aquarium, zoo, golf course, or swimming pool.

    Contacts

    Meredith Farace

    Meredith Farace
    U.S. Department of Education
    400 Maryland Avenue, SW., Rm. 7e280
    Washington, DC 20202
    (202) 453-6800
     

  • Eligibility Details

    To be eligible for a grant under this competition:

    • An applicant must be an individual LEA or a consortium of individual LEAs from one of the 50 States, the District of Columbia, or the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.
    • LEAs may apply for all or a portion of their schools, for specific grades, or for  subject-area bands (e.g., lowest-performing schools, secondary schools, schools  connected by a feeder pattern, middle school math, or preschool through third grade).
    • Consortia may include LEAs from multiple States.
    • Each LEA may participate in only one Race to the Top – District application.
    • Successful applicants (i.e., grantees) from past Race to the Top – District competitions may not apply for additional funding.
    • An applicant must serve a minimum of 2,000 participating students or may serve fewer than 2,000 participating students provided those students are served by a consortium of at least 10 LEAs and at least 75 percent of the students served by each LEA are participating students. An applicant must base its requested award amount on the number of participating students it proposes to serve at the time of application or within the first 100 days of the grant award.
    • At least 40 percent of participating students across all participating schools must be students from low-income families, based on eligibility for free or reduced-price lunch subsidies under the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act, or other poverty measures that LEAs use to make awards under section 1113(a) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA). If an applicant has not identified all participating schools at the time of application, it must provide an assurance that within 100 days of the grant award it will meet this requirement.
    • An applicant must demonstrate its commitment to the core educational assurance areas, including, for each LEA included in an application, an assurance signed by  the LEA’s superintendent or chief executive officer (CEO) 
    • The LEA, at a minimum, will implement no later than the 2014-2015 school year: (a) A teacher evaluation system; (b) A principal evaluation system; and, (c) A superintendent evaluation;
    • The LEA is committed to preparing all students for college or career, as demonstrated by: (a) -Being located in a State that has adopted college- and career-ready standards; or (b) Measuring all student progress and performance against college- and career ready graduation requirements.
    • The LEA has a robust data system that has, at a minimum: (a) An individual teacher identifier with a teacher-student match; and (b) The capability to provide timely data back to educators and their supervisors  on student growth;
    • The LEA has the capability to receive or match student-level preschool-through-12th grade and higher education data; and
    • The LEA ensures that any disclosure of or access to personally identifiable information in students’ education records complies with the Families Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).
    • Required signatures for the LEA or lead LEA in a consortium are those of the superintendent or CEO, local school board president, and local teacher union or association president (where applicable).

    Deadline Details

    The deadline to submit a letter of intent (optional) was due August 23, 2013. The deadline for applications was October 3, 2013. Similar deadlines are anticipated annually.

    Award Details

    The Department anticipates awarding approximately $120 million to LEAs through a FY 2013 Race to the Top – District competition. The maximum grant award will depend on the number of participating students who would be served under the grant. An applicant’s budget request for all years of its project must fall within the applicable budget range shown in the table below. An application will not be considered that requests a budget outside the applicable range of awards. An applicant’s budget must not be greater than or less than the applicable range of awards, and must be appropriate for and consistent with the plan it proposes in its application. For 2,000-5,000 or Fewer than 2,000 participating students, provided those students are served by a consortium of at least 10 LEAs and at least 75 percent of the students served by each LEA are participating students; the award range is $4-10 million.

    • For 5,001-10,000 participating students, the award range is $10-20 million.
    • For 10,001-20,000 participating students, the award range is $20-25 million.
    • For 20,001+ participating students, the award range is $25-30 million.

    Related Webcasts Use the links below to view the recorded playback of these webcasts


    • Funding Classroom Technology to Empower Students and Teachers - Sponsored by Panasonic - Playback Available
    • Maximizing Technology-friendly Workforce Development Grants - Sponsored by Panasonic - Playback Available
    • Funding Data-driven Workforce Development Projects - Sponsored by NetApp - Playback Available

 

You have not selected any grants to Add


Please select at least one grant to continue.


Selections Added


The selected grant has been added to your .



  Okay  

Research Reports


One of the benefits of purchasing an UPstream® subscription is
generating professional research reports in Microsoft® Word or Adobe® PDF format
Generating research reports allows you to capture all the grant data as
well as a nice set of instructions on how to read these reports


Watchlists and Grant Progress


With an UPstream® subscription you can add grants to your
own personal Watchlist. By adding grants to your watchlist, you will
receive emails about updates to your grants, be able to track your
grant's progress from watching to awards, and can easily manage any
step in the process through simplified workflows.

Email this Grant


With an UPstream® subscription, you can email grant details, a research report,
and relevant links to yourself or others so that you never lose your
details again. Emailing grants is a great way to keep a copy of the
current details so that when you are ready to start seeking funding
you already know where to go